What are the different types of economies in the world and where does the US rank in terms of economic freedom?

We know economics is all about putting resources to their best use, so we get the most out of it. Economists use a fancy term called “allocative efficiency” to describe it. By resources, we mean land, labor, capital, entrepreneurial ability, and time.

Now, you may ask could there be different types of economies or economic systems to make the best use of limited (scarce) resources? Yes, indeed. These economic systems help to answer the three essential economic questions of what to produce, how to produce, and for whom to produce?

Let’s take a quick look at the three most common economic systems around the world: they are 1. free market, also called the market economy, 2. centrally planned economy also called the command economy, and 3. mixed economy or Keynesian economy

I don’t want to bore you with lots of text, so briefly I will explain these. But before you leave, make sure to scroll down to check an interesting chart comparing different countries in 2022. I know we all like visuals to better understand something.

So here are the three famous systems:

Market economy: In this type of economy, goods and services exchange freely through market supply and demand forces. In economics, it’s called Laizzes Faire, which means a policy of letting things happen their way, without interference. So, in this system consumers and firms interact freely and maximize their incentives without government intervention. Now, you as a consumer should typically act to satisfy your utility by demanding products you want or need. Similarly, all consumers will do the same. So, consumers signal the producers in the market about what to make and what not to make based on their demand. This helps to answer the question of what goods and services to produce.

Firms act to satisfy their profit motives by producing products at a minimal cost. Because businesses want to get maximum profits, they will adjust the production process to minimize costs so there’s less wastage of resources. This helps to answer the question of how to produce goods and services. Also, no single producer is required to know all the information in terms how many competing producers are there, and what is alternative use of his resources. Prices set by demand of consumers, and supply of every other producer can give him that signal to produce in the best possible way. Because if he charges more than others or don’t make the products people demand, people will not buy his product and go to the one next to him, given the other producer is local and they sell identical products. This has become easier with so many online shops now a days. Thus, the invisible hand or natural market forces will answer the question for whom goods and services are produced.

Let’s take an example, if more people demand more of a specific good, like iPhone, its price tends to rise as well. This happens because we as consumers are willing to pay more for that good. Acting in response, producers wanting more profit, will increase production to satisfy the demand of people. As a result, a market economy tends to naturally balance itself.

Whenever we see a rise in prices in one sector of an industry due to high demand, the scarce resources, such as land, labor, capital, and entrepreneurship shift to those areas where they’re needed the most. In the free market economy., the role of the government is only limited to protecting property rights, this way there is a guarantee of fair competition in the marketplace. People can protect their ideas through patents and copyrights, and this encourages innovation. Thus, a free-market economy is the one with the least amount of government intervention.

Command economy: On the opposite spectrum is the command economy, where the entire price set up and distribution of goods and services are controlled by a central planner or the government. All economic and political decisions are taken by the government or a central committee of very limited people. They decide how to allocate the country’s limited resources. North Korea is one example of this type of economic system. This type of economy is commonly seen in communist countries. Natural market forces of supply and demand can’t decide the price and quantity of goods and services produced and consumed.

Generally, people living in these countries don’t have a high standard of living and don’t enjoy economic freedom. By “economic freedom” we mean the ability to choose to produce something or consume something based on your ability and need. Since the government fails to collect all the information correctly about what to produce and how to produce, a lot of wastage happens. People who advocate a command economy think this system is more equitable because everybody gets an equal share. But at the core of economics is the belief that people want to act for their self-interest. As a result, there is less incentive for businesses to work hard and employ better production techniques to maximize profits. Because if someone doesn’t get to keep the extra share, why work hard for it?

There are flaws in both pure market economy and command economy

Let’s investigate, why both these economic systems are not perfect. We just discussed why the command economy is not a great system, but we also need to know what the limitations of a free-market economy are as well.

In a free market, sometimes, markets can waste scarce resources by producing products at higher than necessary costs. This usually happens when there is very less competition or if one producer displays a monopoly. Due to a lack of competition, there’s no real pressure to bring down costs as a result, prices are inflated. The second type of market failure happens in the case of public goods. Private businesses don’t want to produce these public goods, even though we all collectively enjoy these, and are very necessary for the safety and well-being of our people. Since these types of investments are usually not profitable for private firms to produce, they don’t do that. Services like infrastructure or military, police services or fire departments, parks, basic k-12 education and healthcare for the poor. So, if we are only left to the free market, the people would go without these goods and services and not have basic needs and wants met. Also, there will be more unequal distribution of income and people may have extreme inequalities. So, to solve this problem, some role of government is vital. This type of system is called a Mixed economy.

Mixed economy: Thus in the real world, pure market economies rarely exist because there is usually some government regulation or intervention needed for smooth function. In most countries, like the US, public education, security, law and order, nuclear energy, social security benefits, public goods like parks, and defense are provided by the government. The government also provides regulation, so businesses don’t create monopolies and exploit people by charging very high prices. The government also invests in scientific research to develop future businesses and industries. Additionally, when the economy is not behaving optimally, ie. when a lot of people are unemployed (as in a recession) or if the prices are too high (inflation), government intervention is needed to get the economy back to full employment and achieve stable prices.

How much role the government plays in an economy can vary between countries, but in countries with higher real GDP per capita, there has been less government intervention and more free-market play. In this economic system, the government or the public sector and the free market also known as the private sector, work together to meet social needs. The free-market system is allowed to work independently, but the government intervenes to avoid market failures. Thus, we see this mixed economic system as the most common economic system around the world today.

Here’s a chart from Heritage Index showing how different countries enjoy economic freedom. In their study, they used twelve economic freedom categories. Within these categories, they graded the freedom of doing it on a scale of 0 to 100. It’s interesting to see the twelve economic freedom indicators, which they use to calculate a country’s overall score. Here is the list, I got from their website. https://www.heritage.org/index/about

• Rule of Law (property rights, government integrity, judicial effectiveness)
• Government Size (government spending, tax burden, fiscal health)
• Regulatory Efficiency (business freedom, labor freedom, monetary freedom)
• Open Markets (trade freedom, investment freedom, financial freedom)

The study gives equal weight to each of the above factors.

Economic systems and economic freedom experienced in countries of the world